• Home

  • About Us

  • ML-SAAF Background

  • Study Results

  • Resources

  • ML-SAAF Blog

  • Blog

  • More

    Login Here

    Contact Us
    Subscribe

    © 2020 by Midwest Longitudinal Study of Asian American Families

    School of Social Service Administration
    University of Chicago

    Andrew Yang and Asian American Invisibility in Politics

    December 19, 2019

    The Queen of Unease

    August 13, 2018

    The Decline of Third Generation Asian-Americans

    July 2, 2018

    Asian-Americans Score High in Admissions — Except in Personality

    July 1, 2018

    Asian-American: Immigrant vs. Nonimmigrant

    December 14, 2017

    Third Culture Cuisine

    November 16, 2017

    South Korea: Indifferent or Terrified?

    October 11, 2017

    Is Data Collection on Asian Americans Racist?

    September 11, 2017

    The 'Asian Tax' and a New Twist on Affirmative Action

    August 6, 2017

    Hopes of Rearranging the Pecking Order Under Trump

    July 24, 2017

    Please reload

    Recent Posts

    Disaffirmative Action

    October 2, 2015

     

    In 2004, Princeton researchers published a controversial study demonstrating that Asian American college applicants scoring above 1500 on the SAT were penalized 50 SAT points in admissions considerations. African American applicants scoring above 1500, in contrast, were given a bonus of 230 points, Hispanic applicants were given a bonus of 185 points, and legacy candidates were given a bonus of 160 points. 

     

    Two of the same Princeton researchers followed up with a 2005 study finding that doing away with affirmative action would result in a decrease of African American admissions at elite colleges by nearly two-thirds, from 33.7 percent to 12.2 percent, while the acceptance rate for Hispanic applicants probably would be cut in half, from 26.8 percent to 12.9 percent. Asian Americans would pick up these losses, with their admissions rates rising from 17.6 to 23.4 percent. White admissions would look relatively unchanged.

     

    Why bring up these decade-old studies now? Last Thursday, Princeton University officials released a letter by the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) absolving Princeton of any intention to discriminate against undergraduate applicants of Asian descent. Princeton is one of a handful of elite colleges charged with anti-Asian bias when it comes to admissions. Asian American groups, as well as those opposing affirmative action, relied on the two studies referenced around to argue that elite universities applied principles of disaffirmative action when it came to admitting Asian American students. The OCR report concluded that race was one of multiple factors Princeton took into account in its admissions work. As Inside Higher Ed put it, the OCR report found that

     

    there are so many highly qualified applicants to Princeton that the university rejects many [including Asians] with stellar if not perfect academic records. And OCR found that Asians could also be found among some of the less than perfect applicants, as well.  (From Inside Higher Ed, 9/24/2015).

     

    Princeton appealed to the rubric of broad-based campus diversity where race was just one factor. In other words, a highly accomplished Asian American violinist with a 4.0 GPA and 1580 SAT score might have been admitted were it not for the fact there were 1,000 other such Asian American applicants. 

     

    On its face, this explanation makes sense -- a diversity of backgrounds, skills, and interests is arguably desirable on a college campus. Yet, this explanation also begs the question of why the academic standard for Asian Americans is then raised. Why not simply look for other desirable traits among Asian American applicants?

     

    Whatever the answer, it is clear that universities have not yet solved the conundrum of campus diversity. Nor has the Asian American community. Asian American high school students are being advised to look "less Asian" on their college applications. The Asian American community is also ambivalent on its stance on affirmative action, given the disaffirmative effects it putatively has on Asians. 

     

    Last Thursday's OCR report, rather than resolve the issue, is sure to stoke the debate.

    Please reload

    Activism

    Asian American

    Grace Lee Boggs

    ML-SAAF

    Parents

    Resources

    SSA

    Please reload

    Search By Tags

    December 2019 (1)

    August 2018 (1)

    July 2018 (2)

    December 2017 (1)

    November 2017 (1)

    October 2017 (1)

    September 2017 (1)

    August 2017 (1)

    July 2017 (1)

    June 2017 (1)

    May 2017 (1)

    April 2017 (6)

    March 2017 (1)

    February 2017 (2)

    September 2016 (1)

    August 2016 (1)

    May 2016 (2)

    April 2016 (1)

    January 2016 (1)

    December 2015 (1)

    November 2015 (1)

    October 2015 (3)

    September 2015 (2)

    August 2015 (4)

    July 2015 (5)

    June 2015 (3)

    April 2014 (1)

    Please reload

    Archive